Ruptured versus elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: outcome and cost

Ann Vasc Surg. 1999 Nov;13(6):613-7. doi: 10.1007/s100169900308.

Abstract

During a recent 30-month period, we repaired 10 ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) at our institution. To evaluate the survival, postoperative morbidity, and financial impact of treating RAAA, we compared these patients with 10 randomly selected patients undergoing elective AAA (EAAA). Both groups were comparable for age, gender, and incidence of diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and renal failure. Although we have noted a dramatic increase in survival for RAAA (90%), the morbidity continues to be unacceptably high (60%). Efforts should be made toward better detection of AAA prior to rupture as well as development of strategies to minimize or prevent these major complications. Potential average savings accrued from one patient undergoing EAAA repair rather than RAAA repair ($93,139. 21) can be used to perform screening abdominal ultrasound tests in patients at increased risk of having an AAA.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / economics*
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / mortality
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / surgery*
  • Aortic Rupture / economics*
  • Aortic Rupture / mortality
  • Aortic Rupture / surgery*
  • Blood Loss, Surgical
  • Blood Transfusion
  • Cost Savings
  • Elective Surgical Procedures / economics
  • Female
  • Hospital Costs
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Random Allocation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome